Patentability of Genetic Material – Where Does it Stand Today?

Key points The Federal Court of Australia recently held that an isolated human gene is patentable, as it is a "method of manufacture". Contrary to the Australian position, the US Supreme Court held that an isolated human g...

Read More →

Protecting the Architecture of Happiness Using Trademarks

We have all heard of colour trademarks, shapes, sounds and even scents. They have been around in our trademark law since 1995. While not numerous or necessarily easy to procure,1  they are now practically traditional, as there is...

Read More →

Zipping Around the Kerb – How Not to Use Your Competitor’s Trade Mark

Takeaway tips Although using a competitor’s trade mark as a means of comparison to your own product may not be an infringement of trade mark, it will be an infringement if you objectively indicate that you are the origin of...

Read More →

Bratz Damages Verdict Vacated on Appeal but MGA Keeps $137m in Costs

In an article in the June 2011 issue of the Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, we summarised the first seven years of the epic Barbie vs Bratz litigation.1 Mattel Inc, the owners of Barbie, took proceedings in April...

Read More →

Nietzsche has Kanye West’s Back in Rap Battle – US Copyright Case Tests Originality of Song Lyrics

A case of déjà vu for American musician, film director and fashion designer Kanye West who has found himself the subject of another copyright infringement claim, this time by unsigned rapper Vincent Peters, professionally known ...

Read More →

Louboutin v YSL: Single-Colour Trade Marks in the Fashion Industry

In the July 2011 issue of the Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, we published an article on the litigation in the United States launched by Christian Louboutin to prevent Yves Saint Laurent (YSL) from marketing a par...

Read More →
1 5 6 7 8 9