A Cracka of a Trade mark Dispute
Category: Intellectual Property, Technology & Data
Date: 04 June 2024
Author: Hunt & Hunt - Genuine People
Overview:' BlackSquare Inc. recently opposed the registration of two trade marks by Cracka IP Pty Ltd'€”WINE COLLECTIVE and THE WINE COLLECTIVE.COM.AU. The opposition was based on claims that Cracka IP's marks were identical or too similar to BlackSquare's existing trade marks and could cause confusion.
Date: 04 June 2024
Author: Hunt & Hunt - Genuine People
Key Points of the Decision:
- Trade Marks Involved:
- WINE COLLECTIVE (Application No. 1927725)
- THE WINE COLLECTIVE.COM.AU (Application No. 1941358)
- Claims by BlackSquare Inc.:
- BlackSquare Inc. argued that they were the original owners of the WINE COLLECTIVE mark, having used it since 2009 globally and since 2012 in Australia.
- They claimed the similarity of Cracka IP's trade marks would likely deceive or confuse customers.
- They also argued that Cracka IP's use of the marks was misleading and contrary to law, suggesting bad faith in Cracka IP's application.
- Findings of the Registrar:
- The Registrar found that BlackSquare Inc. did not establish sufficient use or reputation of their trade marks in Australia before Cracka IP's filing dates.
- The evidence did not show that BlackSquare's marks had significant recognition among Australian consumers.
- The Registrar concluded that Cracka IP did not act in bad faith and had legitimate grounds to register their trade marks.
- Outcome:
- The opposition was dismissed, allowing Cracka IP's trade marks to proceed to registration.
- BlackSquare Inc. was ordered to pay costs associated with the opposition.

